Co-occurrence of otitis media with effusion and another environment-dependent disease (selected allergic conditions) (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Postepy Dermatol Alergol
  • v.41(1); 2024 Feb
  • PMC10962365

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Co-occurrence of otitis media with effusion and another environment-dependent disease (selected allergic conditions) (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2024 Feb; 41(1): 78–84.

Published online 2024 Feb 28. doi:10.5114/ada.2023.135602

PMCID: PMC10962365

PMID: 38533367

Oksana Wojas,1 Edyta Krzych-Fałta,Co-occurrence of otitis media with effusion and another environment-dependent disease (selected allergic conditions) (2)2 Konrad Furmańczyk,1,3 Diana Dziewa-Dawidczyk,3 Bolesław Samoliński,1 and Piotr Samel-Kowalik1

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

Introduction

Otitis media eith effusion (OME) is an inflammatory condition of the middle ear that involves accumulation of sterile fluid or effusion in the tympanic cavity with the tympanic membrane intact. The pathophysiology of OME is undoubtedly multifactorial.

Aim

To assess the co-occurrence of OME, allergic rhinitis, and asthma.

Material and methods

The study involved a group of 18,617 subjects aged 6–7 years, 13–14 years, or 20–44 years. ECRHS and ISAAC questionnaires, validated and adopted for Polish conditions, were used in the study.

Results

OME increases the risk of developing allergic rhinitis by nearly two-fold (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.738–2.479 in 6–7-year-olds; OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.299–1.995 in 13–14-year-olds, and OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.262–1.83 in 20–44-year-olds). Protective factors against otitis media with effusion include the number of siblings (the more children in the family, the higher the risk of chronic OM; OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.15–1.346) and consumption of dairy products rich in lactic acid bacteria.

Conclusions

OME significantly more often co-exists with other conditions, particularly allergic rhinitis.

Keywords: otitis media, allergic rhinitis, European Community Respiratory Health Survey II questionnaire, International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood questionnaire

Introduction

Otitis media with effusion (OME; secretory otitis media; glue ear) is an inflammatory condition of the middle ear that involves accumulation of sterile fluid, or effusion, in the tympanic cavity, with the tympanic membrane intact. This effusion in the middle ear is due to Eustachian tube obstruction, which generates relative negative pressure in the tympanic cavity. The fluid may be a transudate, an exudate, or a mucous gland secretion. The transudate results from a hydrostatic imbalance between blood vessel lumina and extravascular spaces. The exudate is a sign of inflammation and indicates an altered permeability of vascular walls. Finally, the thick, mucous secretion is produced by glands found in the ear’s lining, which thickens and undergoes metaplasia into multilayered glandular epithelium over time [13]. Predominant clinical symptoms are hearing loss and the feeling of fullness and fluid swishing in the ear. Otoscopy findings may vary and depend on the type of fluid behind the tympanic membrane. There may be tympanic membrane thickening with hyperaemia at its periphery and along the manubrium mallei, small bubbles of air or an air-liquid level visible behind the tympanic membrane, and/or an amber-coloured or bluish tinge to the tympanic membrane. OME is characterized by its seasonal character, with peak rates during fall and winter and lower rates during summer months. OME is usually diagnosed after an episode of acute otitis media and lasts about 40 days on average. Chronic OME is diagnosed when the condition persists for over 3 months or there are at least 6 episodes over a 12-month period [2, 3]. The key factor in OME pathogenesis is Eustachian tube dysfunction. A normally functioning Eustachian tube allows air to enter the middle ear during swallowing (which equalizes air pressures on both sides of the tympanic membrane); prevents pathogens from entering the middle ear from the nasopharynx; and drains the middle ear via mucociliary clearance. Eustachian tube impairment, either structural or functional, leads to inflammation of the middle ear [3, 4].

The pathophysiology of OME is undoubtedly multifactorial. The factors promoting OME development include age, male sex, attending a nursery, having older siblings, and a low birth weight. One important environmental factor is exposure to cigarette smoke. Inflammatory factors include recurrent upper respiratory infections, primary ciliary dyskinesia, chronic sinusitis, nasal polyps, inadequately treated bacterial acute otitis media, and adenoid hypertrophy. Anatomical factors (craniofacial developmental anomalies) include a cleft palate. In adults, there are also nasopharyngeal cancer, ear barotrauma, and radiation-induced ear toxicity [1, 3, 5]. Moreover, there has been intensive research into the role of allergies in OME pathophysiology over the last several years. According to the ‘one airway, one disease’ concept, suggesting that the entire airways may be affected by an allergic condition, an inflammatory allergic response may be expected to affect the middle ear as well. Importantly, the exudative fluid in patients with OME and a comorbid allergy contains all the cells and mediators found in allergic inflammation. Moreover, nasal mucosa stimulation by allergens leads to Eustachian tube oedema and inflammation, which results in tube dysfunction and development of OME [1, 5]. A cohort study by Kreiner-Moller et al. (Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood (COPSAC)) evaluated the relationship between atopic conditions and OME in children. That study demonstrated co-occurrence of OME and allergic rhinitis (OR = 2.29); however, it did not demonstrate any significant impact of non-allergic rhinitis, asthma, or eczema on the development of OME [6]. In 1984, Tomioka described a new, intractable type of otitis media, eosinophilic OME [1]. OME has been shown to co-occur with asthma, chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps, and atopy. The exudate in this type of OME has the form of thick, yellow, very sticky mucus and contains a large number of eosinophils. Patients with OME sometimes develop hearing loss in the high-pitch range, and there have been reports of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. OME is also common in patients with eosinophilic phenotypes of chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps. OME is most common in women after the age of 50 years [1, 6, 7].

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the co-occurrence of OME and allergic rhinitis and asthma to confirm their common inflammatory mechanisms. We also evaluated the potential risk of tonsillectomy in individuals with a history of OME and analyzed many factors that tend to protect against OME.

Material and methods

The study group consisted of 18,617 respondents, nearly 7.5% of whom had been diagnosed with OME (Table 1). A substantial proportion of the study population had been diagnosed with allergic rhinitis (stratified by age: 37.9% of 6–7-year-olds, 34.6% of 13–14-year-olds, and 36.0% of adults; stratified by place of residence: 37.7% of urban residents and 22.9% of rural residents) and asthma (stratified by age: 19.3% of 6–7-year-olds, 10.2% of 13–14-year-olds, and 12.4% of adults; stratified by place of residence: 14.0% of urban residents and 9.1% of rural residents).

Table 1

Study group characteristics

RespondentsSexPlace of residenceAge
FemaleMaleUrban areaRural area6–7 years13–14 years20–44 years
n%n%n%n%n%n%n%
All N = 18,61710,01153.88,60646.216,56289.002,05511.004,51024.24,72125.49,38650.4
With otitis media with effusion7667.76397.41,2797.71266.156712.63697.84695.0

Open in a separate window

Our study was conducted with the use of European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) II and an International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questionnaires [8, 9] adopted for Central and Eastern Europe. The study was a part of the project titled Implementation of a System for the Prevention and Early Detection of Allergic Diseases in Poland. This project had been designed to include a population of adults (aged 20–44 years) and populations of children (aged 6–7 years) and adolescents (aged 13–14 years) – with the first age group meeting the ECRHS standard and the latter two meeting the ISAAC standard – who reside in eight of the most populated Polish urban areas (the cities of Gdansk, Wroclaw, Poznan, Katowice, Krakow, Lublin, Bialystok, and Warszawa) and one rural area (Krasnostawski County). The areas of residence had been selected in a non-random manner, whereas the respondents in the individual areas had been selected randomly (drawn). The draw had been designed to select a population that would be representative of the given population. The sampling frame was based on the Polish citizen ID (PESEL) number, with the associated information on the person’s name, age, sex, and address. The PESEL database is the State Systems Department at the Polish Ministry of the Interior and Administration. The data on the proportion of the individual stratification subgroups were obtained based on information from a Regional Data Bank. This study was conducted with a computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI) technique. Thirty percent of all ECRHS and ISSAC questionnaire respondents were supposed to undergo additional medical evaluations (skin-prick tests, lung function tests, and serum IgE levels) conducted in accordance with the established diagnostic standard for allergic conditions.

Statistical analysis

The study had been approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw (KB/206/2005) and the Inspector General for the Protection of Personal Data. This study made use of contingency tables and analyzed the prevalence of individual allergic conditions. Logistic regression, odds ratio (OR), and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for that odds ratio were used to determine the risk of allergic conditions potentially affecting otitis media. The level of statistical significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results

OME most commonly co-occurred with allergic rhinitis (303 cases among the 6–7-year-olds, 166 among the 13–14-year-olds, and 214 among adults) and with asthma (139 cases among the 6–7-year-olds, 57 among the 13–14-year-olds, and 91 among adults) (Table 1). Moreover, OME eventually led to adenoidectomy in a substantial proportion of respondents (114 of the 6–7-year-olds, 77 of the 13–14-year-olds, and 61 of adults) (Figures 1, ​,22).

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

The prevalence of otitis media with effusion (and other selected conditions) established as part of an epidemiological study

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Co-occurrence of otitis media with effusion and other selected conditions

Our analysis indicated that OME increases the risk of allergic rhinitis by nearly two-fold. OME also considerably increased the risk of developing asthma (Figure 3). All respondents, irrespective of their place of residence (urban or rural area), had a comparable estimated risk of developing the evaluated conditions during the course of OME (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.544–1.942 for urban residents with allergic rhinitis; OR = 1.752, 95% CI: 1.191–2.577 for rural residents with allergic rhinitis). Interestingly, OME increased the likelihood of adenoidectomy by more than two-fold, particularly in urban areas (OR = 2.402, 95% CI: 1.813–2.449). The most common positive reactions in the skin allergy tests of respondents diagnosed with OME were to perennial allergens, i.e. Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, and cat allergens, with fewer positive reactions to grass, cereal, and birch allergens. Allergen application triggered a skin reaction significantly more commonly in residents of large cities than in rural residents. These were, however, mostly low-intensity localized skin reactions (in the form of a blister measuring 3–6 mm in diameter (Table 2)). The analyzed risk factors facilitating or preventing OME development include: the number of siblings (the more children in a family, the higher the risk of developing OME (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.15–1.346), consumption of dairy products rich in lactic acid bacteria (OR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.05–1.55 in 6–7-year-olds and OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.01–1.58 in adults (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.09–2.49 in urban residents and OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.09–2.49 in rural residents). Smoking was also found to increase the risk of OME in adults (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00–1.44), particularly in urban area residents (OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.05–1.55). Preventive measures, such as antibiotic use three times before the age of 1 year, reduced the risk of OME development in the group of 6–7-year-olds (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62–0.92), 13–14-year-olds (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62–0.99) and 20–44-year-olds (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52–0.95), with the rural and urban subgroups showing comparable figures (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65–0.85 and OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41–0.60, respectively) (Figure 4). Other parameters analyzed for their potential effect on OME development included: a history of measles, a history of chickenpox, or going to kindergarten at an early age did not show any significant protective or causative effects on OME.

Table 2

The absolute numbers (n) and proportions of positive skin allergy tests in the otitis-media-with-effusion group

VariableChildren aged 6–7 yearsAdolescents aged 13–14 yearsAdults
≥ 3 mm3–5 mm≥ 6 mm≥ 3 mm3–5 mm≥ 6 mm≥ 3 mm3–5 mm≥ 6 mm
n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%n%
Birch105.40021.0129.964.910.886.586.5221.6
Grasses/cereals168.742.131.675.7119.010.8108.154.032.4
Wormwood137.110.510.51411.510.810.81713.943.200
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus2010.910.531.61411.5108.243.31613.1129.810.8
Molds (set I)42.142.100119.032.410.8129.810.810.8
Molds (set II)105.40000108.2000075.721.600
Dog84.30010.5119.000001411.410.800
Cat137.110.510.51814.821.610.81310.632.400
Dermatophagoides farinae137.142.121.01512.354.143.32016.354.010.8
Hazel63.231.610.5108.254.10075.743.221.6
Alder73.810.50082.432.410.8104.964.900
Rye158.142.121.097.475.732.454.043.232.4
Lance-leaf plantain52.7000075.710.800129.821.600
Cladosporium herbarum73.80010.575.70000129.810.800
Alternaria tenuis84.342.1001310.721.621.654.021.610.8
Control42.10000000000000000
Histamine13875.42212.0009578.51613.221.610485.21512.010.8

Open in a separate window

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Otitis media with effusion risk factor for allergic rhinitis and asthma (*p < 0.05)

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

Risk assessment of the effect selected factors may have on otitis media with effusion: A – age of respondents (6–7 years), B – place of residents (urban area)

Discussion

The concept of multimorbidity, i.e. concurrent existence of two or more chronic diseases, with the associated multidisciplinary patient care, has recently drawn much attention in the fields of allergy, otorhinolaryngology, and other medical specialties. In 2015, Bousqet et al. described multimorbidity involving the following allergic conditions: allergic rhinitis, asthma, and atopic dermatitis, and emphasized their similar immune and non-immune pathomechanisms [10]. Cingi et al. reported the concept of multimorbidity with respect to allergic rhinitis. Those authors proposed a classification of allergic rhinitis comorbidities into (a) allergic conditions (asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, anaphylaxis), (b) conditions affecting the anatomical structures in proximity to the nose (otitis media, sinusitis, conjunctivitis), (c) problems with sleep and concentration, and (d) turbinate hypertrophy [11]. Our study was an attempt to evaluate the co-occurrence of OME and selected allergic conditions and analyse the effect of other factors on OME development. Out of the 18,617 respondents evaluated in our study 1,405 (including 766 [7.7%] females and 639 [7.4%] males) had been diagnosed with OME. OME was most common in the youngest age group evaluated (6–7-year-old children) with 567 (12.6%) cases, with a lower proportion of affected adolescents aged 13–14 years (369; 7.8%), and the lowest proportion of affected adults (469; 5%). These figures are consistent with other relevant literature reports. OME is the most common ear condition of childhood and the most common cause of hearing loss in children. As much as 80% of children up to 10 years of age have had an OME episode, with the peak incidence between the ages of 2 and 5 years of age. The proportion of those affected with OME decreases with their age, from 20% of the population of 2-year-olds to 8% of the population of 8-year-olds affected. The proportion of OME in the adult population is approximately 0.6% [1, 5, 12].

OME is a multifactorial disease, with the role of allergy in its pathogenesis already having been reported for many years. The mucous membrane of the middle ear and that of the upper and lower respiratory tract both derive from the ectoderm, which suggests that an allergic inflammation in the respiratory tract, may also affect the middle ear and involve the same inflammatory cells and mediators [5, 12]. This was demonstrated by Smirnova et al., who demonstrated that mediators of Th2-mediated inflammatory response, such as interleukins 4 and 5 (IL-4 and IL-5), play an important role in otitis media, especially in chronic otitis media [13]. Additionally, oedema of the mucous membrane in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx contributes to oedema of the pharyngeal orifice of the Eustachian tube resulting in Eustachian tube dysfunction, which, in turn, facilitates the development of OME [14].

Our study also demonstrated co-occurrence of OME and allergic rhinitis. Out of 567 children (6–7-year-olds), 369 adolescents (13–14-year-olds), and 469 adults with OME, allergic rhinitis was detected in 303 (53%), 166 (45%), 214 (45%), respectively. Our analysis indicated that OME increases the risk of allergic rhinitis by nearly two-fold. A 24-study meta-analysis by Zhang et al. evaluated the risk factors for otitis media. Those authors concluded that atopy and allergy increase the risk of ear inflammation [15]. Chantzi et al., who assessed 2,320 children, also confirmed a relationship between allergies and OME development [16]. A study by Norhafizah et al. involving 130 children with OME showed allergic rhinitis in 71 (80.3%) children with a chronic form of OME. Thus, that study demonstrated that allergic rhinitis is an important risk factor in the development of chronic OME (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, most of those children had chronic allergic rhinitis, and skin-prick tests showed the house dust mites Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae to be the most common causative allergens (86.2% and 87.7% of cases, respectively) [17]. A study by Mandel et al. showed positive skin-prick test results in 51 (41.8%) of the 122 evaluated patients with OME. The most common triggering allergens were house dust mites (22%), house pet (cat or dog) allergens (13.9%), moulds (13.1%), and grasses (10.7%) [18]. The skin-prick tests conducted in our study also showed allergies that predominantly involved perennial allergens, such as house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Dermatophagoides farinae) and cat allergens. Allergy to perennial allergens is associated with continual allergen exposure and chronic respiratory tract inflammation, which seems to increase the risk of developing OME.

Our study also demonstrated co-occurrence of OME and asthma in 24.5% of the evaluated 6–7-year-olds, 15.4% of the 13–14-year-olds, and 19.4% of the adults. OME was shown to increase the risk of developing asthma. The relationship between OME and asthma has been proven for a particular type of ear inflammation – eosinophilic OME. Optimal and successful treatment in asthmatics has been shown to help control the symptoms of eosinophilic otitis media. The two diseases have a common feature, which is active eosinophilic inflammation. The exudative fluid in OME contains elevated levels of the eosinophil chemotactic factors IL-5, eotaxin, and ecalectin [9]. Nguen et al. suggested that, according to the concept of united airway disease, allergic inflammation of the lower and upper airways also includes the middle ear. Conversely, another hypothesis states that due to the middle ear’s communication with the airways via the Eustachian tube, airway inflammation may be a risk factor for developing asthma, especially in children [19]. Kim et al. demonstrated a bi-directional relationship between otitis media and asthma. Their studies led them to a conclusion that asthma both increases the risk of otitis media and is a prognostic factor for the development of otitis media. The hazard ratio (HR) for otitis media was 1.46 in asthma patients (95% CI: 1.40–1.52; p < 0.001), whereas the HR for asthma was 1.43 in otitis media patients (95% CI: 1.36–1.50, p < 0.001) [20].

Adenoid enlargement within the first years of life is a morphological manifestation of the high immune activity resulting from exposure to allergens entering the nasopharynx via the oral and nasal routes. The enlargement of lymphatic tissue in response to infections, which are common in childhood, also increases the adenoid size. The role of adenoids in OME pathogenesis may be due to their compressing the pharyngeal orifice of the Eustachian tube, which results in mechanical and functional Eustachian tube dysfunction. Adenoid enlargement is a known risk factor for otitis media development, with OME constituting one of the indications for adenoidectomy [4, 21]. According to the results of our study, adenoidectomy had been performed in 114 (20.1%) of 6–7-year-old children, 77 (20.8%) of 13–14-year-old adolescents, and 61 (13%) of adults. Adenoidectomy was shown to have been two times more common among urban residents than rural residents (urban residents: OR = 2.402, 95% CI: 1.813–2.449). This is likely due to the fact that cities offer an easier access to otolaryngologists and have a higher number of facilities offering otolaryngologic services than rural areas.

Our study demonstrated that ‘non-medical’, i.e. demographic, social, and environmental, factors also play an important role in OME development. The greater number of people in the family, the higher the risk of OME (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.15–1.346). Our observations are consistent with those reported by other authors. Norhafizah et al. demonstrated that 96% of the evaluated children with chronic OME came from large families of more than four family members per household and that having a sibling diagnosed with OME is an important risk factor (25% of children with OME had siblings who had also been diagnosed with this condition, whereas 11.9% of children with OME had a negative history of OME in their siblings) [17]. Another factor increasing the risk of OME in our study was cigarette smoking (adults: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00–1.44, particularly in urban areas: OR = 1.28. 95% CI: 1.05–155). Zernotti et al. also indicated that exposure to cigarette smoke and being raised in a large family are important risk factors for OME development [1]. Conversely, our study demonstrated that receiving antibiotics three times before the age of 1 year reduces the risk of developing OME in the future (the use of antibiotics three times before the age of 1 year reduces the risk of chronic otitis media in 6–7-year-old children (OR = 0.76. 95% CI: 0.62–0.92 in 6–7-year-olds, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62–0.99 in 13–14-year-olds, and OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52–0.95 in 20–44-year-olds). This may be due to the fact that recurrent infections and bacterial colonization of the nasopharynx are important risk factors for OME development. Bacteria enter the middle ear through the Eustachian tube, whose anatomical configuration at this age facilitates bacterial entry [21].

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the complexity and multifactorial nature of OME aetiology and the important role of allergy in OME development. We also addressed the phenomenon of multimorbidity, which due to co-existence of various conditions, calls for a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Zernotti ME, Pawankar R, Ansotegui I, et al.. Otitis media with effusion and atopy: is there a causal relationship?World Allergy Organ J2017; 10: 37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Simon F, Haggard M, Rosenfeld RM, et al.. International consensus (ICON) on management of otitis media with effusion in children. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis2018; 135 (1S): 533-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Niemczyk KWysiękowe zapalenie ucha środkowego. In: Otorynolaryngologia kliniczna. Niemczyk K, Jurkiewicz D, Składzień J, Stankiewicz C, Szyfter W, et al.. Warszawa, Medipage; 2015; 69-74. [Google Scholar]

4. Juszczak HM, Loftus PA. Role of allergy in eustachian tube dysfunction. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep2020; 20: 54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Mur T, Brook C, Platt M. Extranasal manifestation of allergy in the head and neck. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep2020; 20: 21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Kreiner-Moller E, Chawes LK, Caye-Thomasen P, et al.. Allergic rhinitis is associated with otitis media with effusion: a birth cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy2012; 42: 1615-20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Tanaka Y, Nonaka M, Yamamura Y, et al.. Improvement of eosinophilic otitid media by optimized asthma treatment. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res2013; 5: 175-8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Gíslason D, Bjœrnsdóttir US, Blœndal T, Gíslason T. European Community Respiratory Health Survey: The main results so far with special reference to Iceland. Laeknabladid2002; 88: 891-907. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR, et al.. International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J1995; 8: 483-91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Bousquet J, Anto JM, Wickman M, et al.. Are allergic multimorbidities and IgE polysensitization associated with the persistence or re-occurrence of foetal type 2 signalling? The MeDALL hypothesis. Allergy2015; 70: 1062-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Cingi C, Gevaert R, Mosges R, et al.. Multi-morbidities of allergic rhinitis in adults: European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force Report. Clin Trans Allergy2017; 7: 17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Ciprandi G, Torretta S, Marseglia Gl, et al.. Allergy and otitis media in clinical practice. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep2020; 20: 33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Smirnova MG, Birhall JP, Pearson JP. The immunoregulatory and allergy-associated cytokines in the aetiology of the otitis media with effusion. Mediat Inflamm2004; 13: 75-88. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. De Corso E, Cantone E, Galli J, et al.. Otitis media in children: with phenotypes are most linked to allergy? A systematic review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol2021; 32: 524-34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Zhang Y, Xu M, Zhang J, et al.. Risk factors for chronić and recurrent ototis media – a meta-analysis. PloS One2014; 9: e86397. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Chantzi FM, Kafetzis DA, Bairamis T, et al.. IgE sansatization, respiratory allergy symptoms, and heritability independently increase the risk of otitis media with effusion. Allergy2006; 61: 332-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Norhafizah S, Salina H, Goh BS. Prevalence of allergic thinitis in children with otitis media with effusion. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol2020; 52: 121-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Mandel EM, Casselbrant ML, Rockette HE, et al.. Systemic steroid for chronic otitis media with effusion in children. Pediatrics2002; 110: 1071-80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Nguen LH, Manoukian JJ, Sobol SE, et al.. Similar allergic inflamation in the middle ear and the upper airway: evidence linking otitis media with effusion to the united airways concept. J Allergy Clin Immunol2004; 114: 1110-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Kim SY, Kim HR, Min C, et al.. Bidirectional association between asthma and otitis media in children. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol2021; 17: 7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Vanneste P, Page C. Otitis media with effusion in children: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. A review. J Otol2019; 14: 33-9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postȩpy Dermatologii i Alergologii are provided here courtesy of Termedia Publishing

Co-occurrence of otitis media with effusion and another environment-dependent disease (selected allergic conditions) (2024)

FAQs

What organisms are associated with otitis media with effusion? ›

Common pathogens

The most common bacteria in acute otitis media, in order of frequency, are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. These pathogens are also the most frequent organisms associated with sinusitis and pneumonia.

Can allergies cause otitis media with effusion? ›

It is known that otitis media may be caused by various factors such as dysfunction of the Eustachian tube, inflammation reaction, and atopy. A recent meta-analysis indicated that allergic rhinitis was identified as a significant risk factor for otitis media with effusion27.

What causes otitis media with effusion? ›

Causes. Otitis media with effusion is usually a result of poor function of the eustachian tube, the canal that links the middle ear with the throat area. The eustachian tube helps to equalize the pressure between the air around you and the middle ear.

What are the Otoscopic findings in otitis media with effusion? ›

Otoscopic findings in OME are typically central retraction, opacity, and change in tympanic membrane color, sometimes associated with the presence of retrotympanic bubbles3, 5. The pneumatic otoscopy demonstrates an additional decreased mobility of the TM6.

What is the difference between otitis media and otitis media with effusion? ›

Otitis media with effusion (OME) and acute otitis media (AOM) are two main types of otitis media (OM). OME describes the symptoms of middle ear effusion (MEE) without infection, and AOM is an acute infection of the middle ear and caused by bacteria in about 70% of cases (1).

What is otitis media usually associated with? ›

Otitis media is inflammation or infection located in the middle ear. Otitis media can occur as a result of a cold, sore throat, or respiratory infection.

How serious is otitis media with effusion? ›

OME is most often not life threatening. Most children do not have long-term damage to their hearing or speaking ability, even when the fluid remains for many months.

How do you get rid of otitis media with effusion? ›

Otitis media with effusion generally resolves spontaneously with watchful waiting. However, if it is persistent, myringotomy with tympanostomy tube insertion is considered an effective treatment.

How do you get rid of fluid in otitis media? ›

Popping your ears, inhaling steam, doing a saltwater gargle, and using ear drops are some common home remedies that may help drain fluid from the middle ear.

How long does otitis media with effusion last? ›

Most cases of otitis media with effusion go away on their own in a few weeks or months. Treatment may speed up the process. Most children don't have any long-term effects to their ears, their hearing, or their speaking ability. This is the case even if they had fluid build-up in their ears for a long time.

How long does it take for otitis media to heal? ›

How Long Do Ear Infections Last? Middle ear infections often go away on their own within 2 or 3 days, even without any specific treatment. Often, there's fluid in the middle ear even after an infection clears up. If it's there for longer than than 3 months, more treatment might be needed.

What does otitis media with effusion feel like? ›

Otitis media with effusion.

Fluid (effusion) and mucus build up in the middle ear after the infection goes away. You may feel like your middle ear is full. This can continue for months and may affect your hearing.

What are the red flags for eustachian tube dysfunction? ›

Symptoms of patulous Eustachian tube dysfunction include: A sense of fullness in the ears. The ability to hear your own voice, breathing or bodily functions very loudly.

What is the best investigation for otitis media with effusion? ›

Tympanometry is perhaps the most useful of all tests in association with otitis media with effusion (OME). This test reveals a type B result in 43% of cases of otitis media with effusion and a type C result in 47% of cases.

How do you treat otitis media in adults? ›

Most patients can be treated effectively with an analgesic such as a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication or acetaminophen. Choice of initial antibiotic — Our choice for first-line therapy is amoxicillin-clavulanate. In most adults, the dose is amoxicillin 875 mg with clavulanate 125 mg orally twice daily.

Which 3 organisms are most common for causing otitis media? ›

Abstract. The bacterial etiology of acute otitis media (AOM) in children is well known; Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis account for up to 80% of the cases.

What organisms are most common in otitis media? ›

They are: Streptococcus pneumoniae (also called S. pneumoniae or pneumococcus) is the most common bacterial cause of acute otitis media, causing about 40% to 80% of cases in the U.S. Haemophilus influenzae, the next most common bacterium, is responsible for 20% to 30% of acute infections.

What is the most common organism in chronic otitis media? ›

P aeruginosa is the most commonly recovered organism from the chronically draining ear. Various researchers over the past few decades have recovered pseudomonads from 48-98% of patients with CSOM. P aeruginosa uses pili to attach to necrotic or diseased epithelium of the middle ear.

What are the most common infecting organisms for acute otitis media? ›

Infection of the middle ear can be viral, bacterial, or coinfection. The most common bacterial organisms causing otitis media are Streptococcus pneumoniae, followed by non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Moraxella catarrhalis.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 5662

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.